Información General del Proyecto

Imprimir PDF
Unidad coordinadora: Facultad de Psicología.
Nombre del proyecto: Cross-Cultural Consistency and Relativity in the Enjoyment of Thinking vs Doing.
Estado del proyecto: Terminado.

El proyecto inicia el 28-07-2015 y finaliza 21-09-2017

Lista de Participantes

ID Nombre Rol Grado Académico
7 David Torres Investigador Master
8 Massiel Arroyo Investigador Licenciado
9 Mauricio Blanco Investigador Doctor
10 Camila Ordoñez Investigador Master

Descripción del Proyecto

Which is more enjoyable: trying to think enjoyable thoughts or doing everyday solitary activities? Wilson et al. (2014) found that American participants much preferred solitary everyday activities, such as reading or watching TV, to thinking for pleasure. To see whether this preference generalized outside of the United States, we replicated the study with 2,557 participants from 12 sites in 11 countries. The results were consistent in every country: Participants randomly assigned to do something reported significantly greater enjoyment than did participants randomly assigned to think for pleasure. Although we found systematic differences by country in how much participants enjoyed thinking for pleasure, we used a series of nested structural equation models to show that these differences were fully accounted for by country-level variation in 5 individual differences, 4 of which were positively correlated with thinking for pleasure (need for cognition, openness to experience, meditation experience, and initial positive affect) and 1 of which was negatively correlated (reported phone usage)

Población Beneficiada

Quién o quienes?:

Beneficios de la población:

Beneficios para la universidad: